It’s Knowledge Management, Jim, but not as you know it
A recent conversation with a colleague sent me searching back to my archives for a conference presentation I did nearly 16 years ago. The subject of the conference was on the impact of Document Management as an enabler for Knowledge sharing in the enterprise.
Driven by three different technology sectors at the time, Document Management, Search and Portals, Knowledge Management was all the rage back then. No good deed goes unpunished, however, and after several massive project failures and even more non-starter projects, Knowledge Management lost its shine and became a dirty phrase that no self-respecting consultant wanted to be associated with.
Why did Knowledge Management fail in the ‘90s?
They say 20:20 hindsight is a wonderful thing… Reading again through my slides and my notes, made me realise how different this market has become since the late ‘90s. There were a number of factors at the time that made sure that Knowledge Management never took off as a viable approach but, in my view, two were the most dominant:
The first one was the much used phrase of “Knowledge is power”. Leaving aside the fact that knowledge in and by itself very rarely has intrinsic value – it’s the application of knowledge that creates the power – the phrase was quickly misconstrued by the users to mean: “I have knowledge, therefore I have power”. Guess what? Who wants to dilute their power by selflessly sharing out knowledge? Not many users felt altruistic enough to share their prized knowledge possessions, their crown jewels, for the greater good of the organisation. “As long as I hold onto the knowledge, I hold on to the power and therefore I am important, valuable and irreplaceable”. Nobody said so, of course, but everyone was thinking it.
The second one was the incessant focus on the information itself as the knowledge asset. Technology was focused almost exclusively on extracting tacit knowledge from individuals, encapsulating it in explicit documents, categorising it, classifying it, archiving it and making it available to anyone who could possibly need it. There were two problems with this approach: The moment tacit information became explicit, it lost its owner and curator; it also started aging and becoming obsolete. Quite often, it also lost its context too, making it not only irrelevant but often dangerous.
Why are we talking again about Knowledge Management in 2015?
The last decade has brought a silent cultural revolution on knowledge sharing. We have all learned to actively share! Not only did we become a lot less paranoid about sharing our “crown jewels”, but we are all actively enjoying doing so, inside and outside the work environment: Wikipedia, blogs, Twitter, self-publishing, Facebook, Pinterest, LinkedIn, SlideShare, Open-source, crowdsourcing, etc., all technologies that the millennium (and the millennials) have brought to the fore. All these technologies are platforms for sharing information and knowledge. The stigma and the paranoia of “Knowledge is Power” has actually transformed into “Sharing is Power”. The more we share the more are valued by our networks, and the bigger the network grows the more power we yield as individuals. And, surprise-surprise, it’s reciprocal! The bigger the network we create the bigger the pool of knowledge we can draw upon.
What couldn’t have been envisioned in the late ‘90s, or early ‘00s, is that by 2015 the knowledge power would be contained in the relationships and the connections, not in the information assets. Not just connections between knowledge gurus inside an enterprise, but amongst individuals in a social environment, between companies and consumers and amongst professional organisations.
Social Media and Collaboration environments have proven to us that the value of sharing knowledge is significantly higher than the value of holding on to it. We may or may not see the term “Knowledge Management” resurrected as an IT concept, but the reality is that knowledge sharing has now become an integral part of our daily life, professional and personal, and it’s not likely to change any time soon.
I am a Software Strategist, Social Media explorer and Photographer. Professionally, I have been involved with Document Management, Process Management and Content Management for the last 20+ years. The views here are my own and not those of my employer.
Top Posts & Pages
- “Appification” Part 2 – What is the impact to ECM?
- “Appification” Part 1 – Why did we fall in love with Apps?
- Why is voting so archaic?
- IOS – A comet of Jurassic proportions
- CIP – The amazing power of Social Media
- The rise and fall of CIP – by AIIM
- Cloud Computing – Happy 45th birthday!
- Sales 101 – Planning the perfect crime
- No more “On-premise vs SaaS”, please!
- IBM and Box – More than meets the eye
- RT @InfoGovCon: The Information Governance Supporting Software Market Heats Up bit.ly/2p86Fdr 2 weeks ago
- RT @MSillanpaaBMOC: Understanding content analytics starts with understanding what it is not. #ECM bigmenoncontent.com/2017/04/11/the… https://t.co/2p1… 2 weeks ago
- A slightly tongue-in-cheek, but extremely insightful article on Digital Transformation in Banking lnkd.in/dmz5yTF 2 weeks ago
- RT @Alfresco: Is your legacy ECM holding you back? Learn the tell-tale signs with a handy @AIIMIntl infographic over on our blog https://t.… 2 weeks ago
- Of course! :) twitter.com/undrstndgroup/… 2 weeks ago
You can also find me at: